AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Tech talk > 1026845699  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  CD Recordings..... What Do U Know?
Hey,

Im just wondering.... I've heard that if you buy professional recording equipment from pro manufacturers such as tascam, your recording may come out even better then the original source in which u copied from. Well, I was just wondering.....how do recordings from PC Cdr-w's compare with the originals? Any input would be great!
Puc103  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)

07-16-02
  Responses (1-18 of 18)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

07-16-02   I'm not sure about professional cd recordings but if you get ...   Marakanetz

07-16-02   I have made recordings from a pioneer cd recorder, fostex pr ...   Rec

07-17-02   If you are going from a digital source to digital source and ...   Rives

07-17-02   Could anyone give a technical explanation of how the sound i ...   Seandtaylor99

07-17-02   You should admit that re-recording will not be better than o ...   Marakanetz

07-17-02   In digital, unlike analog, re-recording can actually make it ...   Rives

07-17-02   Are you saying that uneven spacing of the pits on the cd con ...   Seandtaylor99

07-18-02   Rives, it's rather playback system has level of jitter x but ...   Marakanetz

07-19-02   I've had good results, re-recording cd's on my alesis master ...   jacks@

07-19-02   Jacks: that's helpful and clears up some of the confusion. ...   Rives

07-19-02: Seandtaylor99
Rives .. reclocking is certainly helpful on playback if the transport does not have a very good clock to begin with. I think jitter is the death of CD sound quality, but I also suspect that manufacturers of cheap CD players use jitter as a kind of "dither" to mask shortcomings elsewhere in their signal path .. I'm certain Marantz does this in their low end players. Jitter adds a warmth and mush which helps out a cheap analog output stage.

As for the error rate there is no way to improve on the error rate you started with since if the bit on the original disk is in error then the information which that bit carried is lost forever.
If this bit error is correctable by the error correction coding then it would be just as correctable on the original disk as on the new disk.
Perhaps you can produce a copied disk which will play better on a marginal transport due to having better reflectivity, but in order to produce this better copy you would have had to play it on a better transport in order to read it.
I maintain that a digital copy can only be the same or worse ... it cannot be better, because it cannot retrieve information lost on the original disk.
I'm not trying to pick an argument, and I am really interested if someone can explain why I'm wrong ... because I have been wrong about audio many times in the past (e.g. digital cables can't sound different ... now I realise they can, and that their are sound explainations as to why).

Seandtaylor99  (Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)


07-19-02   Way back when stereophile ran one of the their first shows a ...   Unsound

07-19-02   Unsound: that's the same experience i've had. i can make c ...   Rives

07-24-02   Rives, i've got an intriguing question here: what if you si ...   Marakanetz

07-24-02   Your right that analog tape won't have jitter issues, but i' ...   Rives

07-24-02   Okay, i spoke to a recording engineer that i know. he's for ...   Rives

07-24-02   I agree with this point of view. so the copy may sound bett ...   Seandtaylor99

07-25-02   The correction in a cd is not in the dac. the correction is ...   Bear


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password