Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
12-05-00
Ehider, i am still the skeptic, but i appreciate your viewpo ... Gmkowal@
12-06-00
I am not sure we are disagreeing - over and undershoot being ... Redkiwi
12-06-00
I will be honest and say that i do not use fiber optic cable ... Gmkowal@
12-06-00
Don't worry about starting a religious war. the reason for t ... Gmkowal@
12-06-00
Frogman, rather than challenge the fact that you hear the di ... Gmkowal@
12-06-00
Gmkowal i don't believe that you understand the signal trans ... Blues_man
12-06-00
Gmkowal just a follow on my previous response. if you don't ... Blues_man
12-06-00
Blues_man - given the inadequacies of the cd protocol and yo ... Kthomas
12-06-00
The problem is really in the transmitter and receiver. even ... Blues_man
12-07-00
I understand that the transmission is real time. i just do n ... Gmkowal@
12-07-00
One more thing, the logic analyzer used actually had 1 meg m ... Gmkowal@
12-07-00
I no longer have an analyzer, but whebn i did it was oked up ... Blues_man
12-07-00
Oops almost forgot, in your test how did you verify that all ... Blues_man
12-07-00
All i did was set up a burst of each pattern and a signature ... Gmkowal@
12-07-00
One more thing. the rep rate of the bits in each burst was 1 ... Gmkowal@
12-08-00
Multiply that by 16 bits per word gmkowal. i guess for the ... Redkiwi
12-08-00
I'm still missing something, but i've been known to be dense ... Kthomas
12-08-00
Now you have got me kthomas - i don't know, and have not don ... Redkiwi
12-08-00
On someone's reccomendation i purchased a radshack digital r ... Blues_man
12-08-00
Redkiwi, i am not a designer of digital audio playback devic ... Gmkowal@
12-08-00
Redkiwi, even if jitter did cause a problem, i do not think ... Gmkowal@
12-09-00
Actually, redkiwi i captured a megasample. i had a meg of aq ... Gmkowal@
12-09-00
Wow, this is a much better response than i'd anticipated whe ... Danielho
12-09-00
It is asynchronous, and it's fixed rate. in a "normal& ... Kthomas
12-09-00
Hi, i've been away for a while, but have been watching the p ... 1439bhr
12-09-00
Geez... sorry for the brain fart in my posting above. 1/4 o ... 1439bhr
12-10-00
Nice explaination 1439bhr! you seem to be the first poster w ... Gmkowal@
12-10-00
1439bhr, i got a question i am sure you can answer. does the ... Gmkowal@
12-11-00
using a fifo and reclocking is not the end all and is not ... Blues_man
12-11-00
I have read your post and can not dispute your claims with t ... Gmkowal@
12-12-00
The levinson dac provides spdif, aes/ebu, and toslink input ... 1439bhr
12-12-00: Blues_man
Gmkowal 2 points here. It ought to be obvious that your test is inadequate, simply use a CD source. It should take about 4 seconds if memory serves me to fill a 1 meg buffer of SPDIF data. That's real time. When I say jitter can not be measured accurately I'm simply pointing out that any device that measures jitter has to have a clock, that clock has jitter, so your measurement has to be off by some amount. That amount may be small but it always exists. My point was that many claims of jitter reduction devices are total BS. 1439bhr I thought the Levinson also had a proprietary data transfer interface. My point was that some component combinations do and they seem to do the best job. My points were simply that jitter reduction devices are a poor substitute for a good implementation between a DAC and transport. They may even incrrease jitter. My second point is that the jitter on most "good" systems is low enough to not be a major factor in the sonic degredation. I believe jitter is third behind errors in the transport and signal loss of high Khz signals.
Blues_man (Threads | Answers | This Thread)
12-12-00
Blues, you are absolutely correct! the purpose of my test wa ... Gmkowal@
12-15-00
Thank you bluesman, 1439, gmkowal, redkiwi and all of the ab ... Bmpnyc
12-15-00
Sorry, i guess we got a little carried away with the technic ... Gmkowal@
05-30-02
Daniel, i've just posted a reply saying that if you cannot h ... Dragont
05-31-02
Whether different digital cables sound different is very dep ... Audioengr
06-01-02
Audioengr ( hi !! ), what part do you think vswr and imped ... Sean
07-13-02
Due to different configurations they act as tone controls. a ... Zilla
08-03-02
Hi, digital cables can make a huge difference. but all th ... Jt25741
08-04-02
Jt, rather than clog up your inbox and have to make several ... Sean
08-13-02
Zilla - it is impossible for a digital cable to act as a &qu ... Audioengr
08-13-02
Jt25741 - you are dead-on when you say that jitter is the ma ... Audioengr
08-13-02
Sean - transmission-line effects are the main concern with d ... Audioengr
08-26-02
I would have to agree with the impedance argument, if a digi ... Orbeck
09-02-02
Ooop's, i was commenting on speaker cables and interconnects ... Zilla
10-17-02
Frogman's insistance on believing that kimber's digital cabl ... Johnmcelfresh
10-18-02
John: i don't think that you'll find anyone here that would ... Sean
11-11-02
This is a long and old thread. read 1439bhr and audioengr f ... Neilejhunt
|
|
