AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Cables > 1168464422  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Why Palladium in cables, wiring, etc. . .?
There seems to be a growing aura around Palladium. A perfectly good noble metal, Palladium came to popular fame during the now very dubious episode of cold fusion, proposed by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Ponse. But the word Palladium itself has a much older and classical origin. A Palladium was originally a statue bearing the likeness of the goddes Pallas, and only much later it referred to buildings inspired by the neo-classical style of Andrea Palladio. Today the word bears both connotations of classical understated elegance as well as hinting at quasi esoteric neo-science and mysteries. Hence it is easy to understand why savvy marketing consultants may warmly recommend that products and brands aspiring to prestige may be named after the metal.

Yet, when it comes to discovering a physical reason why engineers may opt to actually employing this fine metallic element as a conductor in interconnects, chords, wires and electrical contacts, things become rather murky and unclear. For example, SilverSmith Audio now advertises some of its products as containing Palladium. And the newest iteration of the Dodson 218 DAC, by virtue of the company having been purchased by SilverSmith, now sports internal Palladium-alloy wiring.

What is it, besides its resistance to tarnish and corrosion, and the obvious aura in the name, that is causing such engineering choices? Palladium's disconcertingly high index of resistivity does not seem to justify its selection. Per the list below, Palladium is 6.65 times as resistive as
Silver, 6.28 times as resistive as copper, almost 4 times as resistive as Aluminum, and
approximately 10% more resistive than Iron. The good news is that Palladium appears
to be a little bit more conductive than Tin, and almost twice as conductive as Lead.

Resistivity:
Silver: (20 °C) 15.87 nO·m
Copper: (20 °C) 16.78 nO·m
Gold: (20 °C) 22.14 nO·m
Aluminum: (20 °C) 26.50 nO·m
Rhodium: (0 °C) 43.3 nO·m
Zinc: (20 °C) 59.0 nO·m
Nickel: (20 °C) 69.3 nO·m
Iron: (20 °C) 96.1 nO·m
Platinum: (20 °C) 105 nO·m
Palladium: (20 °C) 105.4 nO·m
Tin: (0 °C) 115 nO·m
Lead: (20 °C) 208 nO·m

Any ideas?
Guidocorona  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)

01-10-07
  Responses (1-40 of 40)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

01-10-07   Thank you for asking this question. i'm curious to see the ...   Rcprince

01-10-07   Buildings in the style of palladio are referred to as: palla ...   Nsgarch

01-10-07   Once upon a time aluminum was the coolest, futuristic marke ...   Mezmo

01-10-07   This post is interesting. pure note just announced a titaniu ...   Sonic_genius

01-10-07   Metallurgically speaking, i can't help you but from a " ...   Acresverde

01-10-07   Not to stick my neck out too far, but i think a large part o ...   Tplavas

01-10-07   Good guessed tplavas. are you saying there is ac in the cir ...   Guidocorona

01-10-07   I feel that i've been called out (albeit sub silencio yet ri ...   Mezmo

01-11-07   all audio electrical signals are alternating current, as des ...   Zaikesman

01-11-07   Marketing apart (i.e. "the new kid on the block" s ...   Gregm

01-11-07   Thank you all! keep the interesting info coming. in the me ...   Guidocorona

01-11-07   There is a lot of "cable neurosis". cables are int ...   Dazzdax

01-11-07   Gc if your comment regarding the resistivity of titanium ha ...   Acresverde

01-11-07   I have been told by powers much smarter than i that for the ...   Jadem6

01-12-07   Concerning titanium as a structural material for jacketing c ...   Guidocorona

01-12-07   guido, you forgot flammability... might produce that "r ...   Serus

01-13-07   Titanium & palladium together offer many advantages; one is ...   Gregm

01-13-07   Serus, you might have something going there. . . from wicki ...   Guidocorona

01-14-07   I think palladium's not oxidizing is its attraction. i have ...   Tbg

01-14-07   Man, this thread is way off in left field. let's get back t ...   Kevziek

01-14-07   Kevziek, i am afraid you are being too simplistic. there is ...   Tbg

01-14-07   Tgb: i don't think that was kevziek's argument, but regardle ...   Zaikesman

01-14-07   Zaikesman, your post makes sense. ultimately it's how the ca ...   Rja

01-15-07   Tbg, i never made the argument that wire is wire. i questio ...   Kevziek

01-15-07   Kevziek and zaikesman, sorry i misinterpreted what kewziek w ...   Tbg

01-15-07   Tbg: yes, all-carbon cables can be more susceptible to hum ( ...   Zaikesman

01-15-07   Zaikesman, i this is caused by ground loops through the grou ...   Tbg

01-15-07   Tbg: then i think the fact that the conductors happened to b ...   Zaikesman

01-15-07   It may also have been the efficient horn speakers i had at t ...   Tbg

04-26-08   Based on my limited experience with certain items plated wit ...   Sherod

04-26-08   I agree with sherod 300%. my experience has always been that ...   Michaelhwolff

04-27-08   For what it is worth, the palladium cables were ok for the m ...   Ozzy

04-27-08   What all the fuss about palladium. that stuff is really medi ...   Shadorne

04-28-08   I'm surprised no one makes superconducting cables yet. all y ...   Ait

03-07-10   Just came across this thread...the last two posts are classi ...   C1ferrari

03-08-10   Ait, i heard a superconducting cables long ago. it was in no ...   Tbg

03-08-10   Norm, unfortunately mercury becomes superconductive at 4.2 ...   Guidocorona

03-08-10: Tbg
Nevertheless, Guido, the Mercury at least looked solid. I am not sure anyone really knew about superconductivity then. I really don't know why he was vetted to mercury. He never said. He was with the Redstone facility.
Tbg  (Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)


03-09-10   Hi norm, superconductivity was discovered before our time. ...   Guidocorona

03-09-10   Guido, i have been reading about superconductivity. i found ...   Tbg


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password