Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
10-13-11
Full moon In_shore
10-13-11
Oh c'mon d, you know you're dying to chime in? high-mass pla ... Halcro
10-13-11
Hi henry, won't disappoint you.... ;-) .. it's not high mas ... Dertonarm
10-13-11
Inshore referred to this information on the mm thread which ... Ct0517
10-14-11
Ecir38 (10-12-11), you could try equarack or the at616 that ... Dgob
10-14-11
Dertonarm, i sometimes wonder if physics isn't a little lik ... Dgob
10-14-11
Dertonarm, that should have read: "guest". Dgob
10-14-11
Dear dgob, sorry, but imhpov (" in my honest point of v ... Dertonarm
10-14-11
Here is a review with some interesting explanations. probabl ... Syntax
10-14-11
Syntax a.j. conti's technical papers on his over all design ... In_shore
10-14-11
Dear in_shore, i never thought about acrylic but am not sure ... Nandric
10-14-11: Rauliruegas
Dear Dgob: There is no doubt that exist a scientific ( physic/mathematic and the like. ) answer for many audio phenomenons but the issue is that till today does not exist and no one already attempt to " build " an audio model that not only has all the audio factors/parameters involved when we are talking to predict for sure audio system or audio item quality performance level but that has all the interactions/relationship between those factors/parameters that have influence in that " live " performance. DT " won't go on theoretical here " because IMHO he has nothing on hand that could give you a prediction about performance sound between cartridge/headshell/tonearm and its several alternatives on weight, compliance, stylus shape, cantilever material, headshell build material, tonearm whole design, internal cable, cartridge pin connectors, cable, phono stage and the like.
The best IMHO that we can do is try different alternatives and over hundred maybe thousands of " observation " method achieve some partial conclusions.
Yes, I agree with you: that scientific " stage " almost always arrive late to the audio party, especially when we are talking of quality performance level on analog because when we are talking of electronic designs the scientific " stage/path " is the first guest to arrive. So depend of waht we are talking about and what we want to know and with what level of consistence and accuracy. I'm with the scientific " road " always that can be use it and always when is " practical/workable ".
Regards and enjoy the music,
R.
Rauliruegas (System | Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)
10-15-11
Raul, as though to prove the point, following your review, ... Dgob
10-14-11
Dear friends: another stand alone tonearm arm board in anoth ... Rauliruegas
10-15-11
Well - as posted earlier - imho both bd as well as dd have w ... Dertonarm
10-15-11
Oh yes, who ever has experienced a well adjusted idler drive ... Thuchan
10-15-11
Well well, i received so many writings asking me to give som ... Thuchan
10-15-11
Dear thuchan, sure - combinations of two drive principles ar ... Dertonarm
10-15-11
cheap? cheaper? cheapest? Syntax
10-15-11
Dear syntax, not really simple in graduations - rather more ... Dertonarm
10-15-11
Dear thuchan: as you said different drive tt systems works d ... Rauliruegas
10-15-11
Dear thuchan: i would like to add what i posted several time ... Rauliruegas
10-15-11
Dear friends: this is the link that i forgot to posted in my ... Rauliruegas
10-15-11
Thuchan, now you have me even more confused. i had been ask ... Peterayer
10-15-11
Dear dgob: good, the 100cmk4 is very good performer. in the ... Rauliruegas
10-15-11
Dear thuchan: as you said different drive tt systems works d ... Rauliruegas
10-16-11
Peterayer, sorry this was a wrong transfer when i wrote the ... Thuchan
10-16-11
dear raul, when i am assessing a turntable's sonic footprin ... Thuchan
10-16-11
If i understand raul's position here then i fully agree with ... Pryso
10-16-11
Dear thuchan, i can't imagine anyone could not be satisfied ... Geoch
10-16-11
dear geoch, agree absolutely. but does a friendly group sh ... Thuchan
10-16-11
I'm sorry, i didn't mean to be instructive. Geoch
10-16-11
No no geoch, you were not! Thuchan
10-17-11
Dear thuchan: you posted...........+++++ " i do not ca ... Rauliruegas
10-17-11
Dear pryso: yes, you understand what i posted about and yes ... Rauliruegas
10-17-11
Dear raul, don't shorten the content of my sentence - this ... Thuchan
10-17-11
I like raul's suggestion to start another thread about the g ... Peterayer
10-17-11
Dear thuchan: things states as is: because was in that way y ... Rauliruegas
10-18-11
Dear thuchan, i guess you now have got the message i've gott ... Dertonarm
10-18-11
Dear daniel, 'a few month before'? i thought that someone wh ... Nandric
10-18-11
Dear peter: that's what i will try in an overall way and not ... Rauliruegas
10-18-11
Deartonearm, yes very funny communication style: "end ... Thuchan
10-18-11
Dear thuchan: when some one say: " i like it " &qu ... Rauliruegas
10-18-11
Dear nikola, " a few months" is everything startin ... Dertonarm
10-18-11
Dear thuchan, have fun .... sometimes even old and strange w ... Dertonarm
10-30-11
Btw rmaf is over. did anyone listen to the onedof player? ... Thuchan
11-19-11
Seems the onedof was not a mayor focus point at rmaf 2011. ... Thuchan
11-19-11
Yes, from the former vp of micro-seiki (now ceo of stellavox ... Jcarr
11-20-11
This sounds very very interesting for me. boku wa micro seik ... Thuchan
11-20-11
Although the techdas design breaks all of the prerequisites ... Jcarr
|
|
