AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Analog > 1058745046  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Who will survive? One last table til I die.
I want to buy a final turntable (call it 25 years worth of use until I can't hear or don't care). I want to be able to get parts and have it repaired for the next quarter century. I would also like the sound quality to be near the top or upgradable to near the top for that time period. I don't necessarily require that the manufacturer be solvent that long (the preferable situation), but otherwise the parts would have to be readily available and the design such that competent independent repair shops be able to fix it. I won't spend more than $10,000 and prefer (but don't require) an easy set up that doesn't need constant tweaking. I'm willing to pay for the proper stand and isolation needed over and above the initial cost.

I've got 9,000 LPs, and it doesn't make sense to start over replacing them with CD/SACDs (although I have decent digital equipment) even if I could find and afford replacements. Presently I have a CAT SL-1 III preamp and JL-2 amp, Wilson speakers, Sota Cosmos table, SME IV arm, and Koetsu/Lyra Clavis/AQ7000nsx cartridges.

Thanks in advance for your input. Steve
Suttlaw  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

07-20-03
  Responses (51-100 of 137)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

12-08-04   Hi, guys: i think my airy2 is finally getting broken in. ...   Suttlaw

12-08-04   Gregadd, excellent and well-argued post, at least when i re ...   Dougdeacon

12-08-04   Suttlaw: you might want to consider the aerial sw-12.   Gregadd

12-08-04   Dear gregadd: you, like me, have to learn a lot on all those ...   Rauliruegas

12-08-04   Dear steve: about the phono cable i recomended: analysis plu ...   Rauliruegas

12-08-04   Raul,so what ss amp/preamp/phono do you have?   Audio999

12-08-04   Raul,upon reading the same stereophile article from the 1994 ...   Twl

12-08-04   Raul, if i could listen to 20-30 hours of live music per mo ...   Gregadd

12-08-04   Raul, i wasn't going to say this, but i do have to respond t ...   Gregadd

12-09-04   Hi twl:*****" so yes, i understand your concerns about ...   Rauliruegas

12-09-04   Dear gregadd: that's exactly the point and where the differe ...   Rauliruegas

12-09-04   Raul,once again what ss amp/preamp/phono do you have?   Audio999

12-09-04: Teres
Uggh, this is suppose to be an analog thread, but I just can't resist countering Rauls outrageous tube amplifier comments. I have designed, built and modified a number of amplifiers, both tube and solid state. So my comments are based on actual listening experience.

Tubes and transistors are both devices that produce gain using similar concepts but with quite different characteristics. Tubes have good linearity (low distortion) but low gain. Transistors on the other hand have very poor linearity (high distortion) and very high gain.

To get around the distortion problems most tube amplifiers and all transistor amplifiers use feedback to eliminate distortion. Here I use the term distortion in a very broad sense, anything that deviates from the original signal including frequency response, noise along, harmonic and IM distortion. More feedback means lower distortion, including the "equalizer" effect that Raul mentioned. Since transistors have very high gain and it is easy to produce lots of feedback and therefore very low distortion, ruler flat frquency response, high damping factor, vanishingly small harmonic distortion, blah, blah. Tube amps on the other hand have much more limited gain and can only produce limited feedback. The result is considerably worse distortion measurments, in spite of the fact that they are lower distortion devices to start with.

But there is a significant hitch to this story. It turns out that feedback has a clearly audible negative effect on sound. To date I don't know of anyone that is able to measure this affect. It does not show up in any of the standard distortion measures. This is part of why there is so much controversy about this topic. I have a lot of first hand listening experience regarding feedback and I assert that this is both real and significant.

So like so many things audio it all boils down to compromise. Feedback brings both good and bad to the table and the optimum balance is both system and taste dependent.
In a given context and a set of personal preferences there will be an optimal balance between feedback and distortion. That optimum balance will not be the same in a different system or with different tastes. So it's never as simple as choice between feedback or no feedback or for that matter tubes or transistors.

The goal for good amplifier design is the lowest possible distortion with the smallest amount of feedback. That means that the amplifier needs to have the lowest possible open loop distortion. Open loop distortion is the level of distortion before feedback is applied. A well designed amplifier implemented with high quality components will require less feedback to arrive at a distortion goal and will therefore sound better.

So if you look at amplifiers from the perspective of levels of feedback the high feedback end of the spectrum is the exclusive domain of trasistor amplifiers. On the opposite end of the spectrum is single ended triode amplifiers with no feedback at all. Each have their strengths and weaknesses.

Personally I find that nirvana is a zero feedback amplifier. But the no feedback path is not for the faint at heart. Everything has to be perfect or you will hear it. Component quality become hugely important. Speaker choices are very limited and there are major speaker/amp synergy issues. Feedback extracts a price but it does make things a lot easier.

Chris

Teres  (System | Answers | This Thread)


12-09-04   Audio999- raul is not going to tell you. ever. he's not g ...   Jimbo3

12-09-04   Chris & tom, thanks for the informative (raul, you understa ...   Jphii

12-09-04   Jim,i think you are right. he didn't anwswer my question abo ...   Audio999

12-09-04   Wow! just tuned into this thread. no offence here honestly. ...   Ecclectique

12-10-04   Audio999- fact is that raul needs to take considerable time ...   Jimbo3

12-10-04   Well, how about that?   Twl

12-10-04   Dear twl and teres: with respect to the answer given by mr. ...   Rauliruegas

12-10-04   "the ideal amplifier's mission is to work as a perfect ...   Gregadd

12-11-04   Anybody notice how raul's english improved about an order of ...   Armstrod

12-11-04   Raul, i do agree that there are some favorable characteristi ...   Twl

12-11-04   Dear twl:*****" the distortion from this(my personal) a ...   Rauliruegas

12-11-04   Raul?   Vvrinc

12-11-04   Raul, yes, i know that tubes are voltage devices. bipolar t ...   Teres

12-11-04   indeed. one wonders who actually wrote it. is some ss amp bu ...   Dougdeacon

12-11-04   Raul- would love to test it for three months. everyone els ...   Jimbo3

12-11-04   Raul, anyone who thinks that the location and order of harmo ...   Twl

12-12-04   Dear teres:****" ultimately, there will never be such t ...   Rauliruegas

12-12-04   Dear twl:****" raul, anyone who thinks that the locati ...   Rauliruegas

12-12-04   Here is a very recent article "cut and pasted" fro ...   Twl

12-12-04   And my last post was premised on the damping data alone, and ...   Twl

12-12-04   Raul- if you really wanted someone like me to learn, how 'b ...   Jimbo3

12-12-04   Dear twl: just checked out your system. was curious about ...   Suttlaw

12-12-04   Suttlaw, that rottweiler "tweak" can go anywhere h ...   Twl

12-12-04   Perhaps we can talk some time about the real weakness of tub ...   Gregadd

12-12-04   Gregadd, those frqequency extreme and transient softness iss ...   Twl

12-12-04   Also if the transformer is eliminated entirely as with tube ...   Rushton

12-13-04   Hmmm... audioholics seems to have somewhat contradicted the ...   Sean

12-13-04   Here's a link to the entire article. http://www.audioholics ...   Twl

12-13-04   To me, the key here is not whether there may be some slight ...   Twl

12-15-04   Tom mentions i agree. esepcially considering how the relevan ...   Gregm

12-15-04   I still haven't had a chance to read the articles, but i jus ...   Sean

12-15-04   If you want to know what kind of frequency reponse your syst ...   Gregadd

12-15-04   Hi: this statement comes from audioholics ( the twl link ):* ...   Rauliruegas

12-15-04   Clear audio, vpi, linn, maybe basis, maybe walker. not neces ...   Elinor

12-15-04   i hope this puts an end to this discussion. "...gregad ...   Gregadd

12-15-04   Dear gregadd: ***" i hope this puts an end to this disc ...   Rauliruegas

12-16-04   Good grief, raul, get over yourself.   Jimbo3


< Prev 1 | 2 | 3 Next >

  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password