AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Analog > 1033078770  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Why vinyl?
I understand the thoughts of a lot of you that digital is harsh and bright and has an edge. I know that analog has a warmer fuller sound, otherwise why would so many people put up with the inconvenience of records, cartridges, cleaners, tone-arm adjustments, etc. I used to be there. Of course all I had was a Garrard direct drive turntable. If the idea is to get as close as possible to the original source, why has not open-reel tape made a huge comeback. After all that's how most of the stuff was recorded in the first place. Very few were direct to disk recordings. Why would dragging a stylus through a groove be better than the original? There used to be a company out there called In-Synch that used the original masters and sold cassettes of them, dubbed at 1:1 ratio. I was the happiest person in the world when CD's came out and I could throw out my disk-washer and everything else that went with it, including the surface noise and the TICKS and POPS. Just something I've wondered about.
Elmuncy  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)

09-26-02
  Responses (1-60 of 60)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

09-26-02   I'm with you. i love cd's and the digital technology. once ...   Dweller

09-26-02   I was the happiest person in the world this week when i sold ...   Twl

09-26-02   I dabble in both worlds. i also have an sacd player. elmuncy ...   Jmcgrogan2

09-26-02   When cd's sound can match that of a good analog rig then i a ...   Thorty40

09-26-02   That's an interesting point about "why not tape?". ...   Kthomas

09-26-02   To answer your question from the viewpoint of someone who st ...   Viridian

09-27-02   Viridian, good post.   Judit

09-27-02   I have just begun a rexamination of my life (which of course ...   Gbeard

09-27-02   i also miss album covers. i was talking to a friend the oth ...   Blkadr

09-27-02   Viridian, the studio mastering speed is 15ips. at speed of ...   Marakanetz

09-27-02   I've tweaked my cd-based system to where (to my ear) there i ...   Danner

09-27-02   Hey marakanetz...15ips and 30ips are both used. it depends ...   Phild

09-27-02   Thanks for the kind words judit. marakenetz, i was speaking ...   Viridian

09-27-02   Blkadr ... you're right. sound quality aside, lps are much ...   Seandtaylor99

09-27-02   I belive there is a happy medium and both can co exist quit ...   Natalie

09-27-02   I have been into digital for the entire time i have really b ...   Tok20000

09-27-02   I've been collecting vinyl since the mid 60's so i predate d ...   Lugnut

09-27-02   For what it's worth, i find the regimen of having to disc do ...   Timwat

09-27-02   Why vinyl? why not. like lugnut i have albums that are 30 ...   hfloyd5@

09-27-02   I believe now is the best time to jump back to vinyl. why!? ...   Edle

09-27-02   The sonic differences: just what is it about vinyl’s ...   Thomasheisig

09-27-02   Nice analysis thomasheisig! kf   Tok20000

09-27-02   For a long time, i wouldn't buy a tt or records. everytime ...   Lakefrontroad

09-27-02   Just a couple of additional thoughts. when cd came out it wa ...   Blkadr

09-27-02: Basement
I read an article about 5-6 years ago where sony built the best, 24-96 digital recorder they could, and they took it to oceanway studios. In short, the analog tape still won out. There are more posters here that would know more about that than I would.
There are meny ways to view the differences/superiority of cd's and records, but for sound, the record will always beat the cd provided the playing field is equal.
The first reason is there is a LOT more information that can be stored on a typical lp than a 16-bit cd.
The second is that the technology and cost involed for accurate reproduction of a cd is more complicated and costlier than a record.
For 100$ or 200$ it is probably hard to find an anolog rig that would sound better to most people than a cd player of that amount. But I could easily put together a record player for 400$ that would outclass a 400$ to 1000$ cd player. There are many record playing systems out there that cost 2500$ that no 16-bit player could touch in terms of sound quality at any price, that sounds so obviously better that it is not a matter of opinion.
The reason cd's get a reputation for sounding harsh the way you desribe is because when things go wrong in a cd player, or rather, things in the design are a limitation to sound quality, that is the first thing to happen with the sound quality. Vinal is the opposite. But you can easily have a record player that sounds harsh and nasty and metallic. For me, it is usually a struggle to get my cd player to sound as clean and detailed as my analog.
Consider this- a speaker is a magnet, with a coil, and produces sound by means of a varying electrical input. A microphone is a diaphram that has a magnet, a coil, and produses an electrical output. A tape head produces a signal through a coil onto magnetic tape. Do you see it? All processed the same way.
A cartridge is like a microphone but replaces a diaphram getting soundwaves from the air with a needle that gets signal from a hard surface. So it is pretty easy to understand that a record playing system can ultimately be so capable of a high level of fidelity.
There is a lot more that has to happen in a digital playback system to produce a signal to listen to. And that signal, which started from a magnet/coil has to end with a magnet/coil.
Sure, there are a lot of things/alterations that can, and do happen to the signal that make sound quality suffer in a record player, but a lot of these same things also apply in degragading the sound quality in a cd player. They just have a different effect on the sound quality. The same rules of preserving the integrity of the signal still applies.
If you don't believe me, (extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof), try spending some money on analog the way you spend it on digital. It's quite honestly hard to say how much, because the more you have spent on a cd player, the less of a percentage of that you would have to spend on a record playing system, But you could go to your local dealer, and say, "my digital system cost me 'x' amount of dollers, and if that analog system for the same amount sounds better than my cd, I'll buy it, and eat my shoe".
If it doesn't, e-mail me and I'll give you 10 bucks.

Basement  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)


09-28-02   Thomasheisig, you realise, of course, that film playback is ...   inpepinnovations@

09-29-02   Inpepinnovations, something more to say ? or is that all ? i ...   Thomasheisig

09-29-02   Come on, inpepinnovations -- that's 32 analogue frames/sec : ...   Gregm

09-29-02   Thomas & greg, i am just pointing out the dangers of using a ...   inpepinnovations@

01-19-03   I give up. you're right. i've just ordered a new, to me, tur ...   Elmuncy

01-20-03   Really bad analog to digital conversions is a good reason. s ...   Ntscdan

01-23-03   I was just browsing at the sf stereo yesterday and came acro ...   3chihuahuas

03-01-03   The ticks, pops and maintenance of vinyl are just not worth ...   boje@

03-02-03   Because it touches, moves and inspires every time. that's wh ...   Tuboo

03-04-03   I must chime in here as a long time cd listener and brand ne ...   Matt8268

03-04-03   I love the way the original question concerned open reel tap ...   Viridian

03-05-03   Viridian, perhaps because it is impossible to find new relea ...   Albertporter

03-05-03   No, albert, i can't read it the way that you do. the questio ...   Viridian

03-05-03   I have recently gotten back into vinyl after 15 years. all t ...   Bld63

03-05-03   Digital breaks up the unitary spatial perspective into plane ...   Asa

03-05-03   I know at least one person who still uses open reel as a mai ...   Nrchy

03-05-03   Asa, well said. i agree completely.   Unsound

03-06-03   Oh my god, unsound, we've met in the middle! i saw your post ...   Asa

03-06-03   I am eating peanuts, don't bother me! oh, you want some? ;-)   6chac

03-07-03   Hi william! yes, i can see that, like elmucy, that if ticks ...   Asa

03-11-03   I like vinyl for the "cheapness". just today i bo ...   Playtrim

03-11-03   No one loves vinyl more than me...but its about the music..n ...   jrd@

03-12-03   I agree with that too jrd, wholeheartedly. but it would be n ...   Asa

03-13-03   It is about two years ago, that i started experimenting with ...   Detlof

03-14-03   Heres my 2 cents worth 1st pops and clicks, pops are dirt an ...   Rockinroni

03-14-03   Nice post ron.   Asa

03-14-03   Thanks ron. you addressed the importance of quality and how ...   Albertporter

03-15-03   Ron points well made. it really is separating the forest fr ...   Gajgmusic

03-15-03   Very good points ron, in fact i sometimes tend to suspect, t ...   Detlof

04-11-03   With the utmost of respect i'll recount a recent experience. ...   domo@

04-11-03   Well spoken from there downunder! hear-hear! ps: you forgot ...   Detlof

04-11-03   Hello detlof, good to see you again along these shores. of c ...   Gregm

04-11-03   Pops and cracks ?? i hear nothing but music from my black an ...   Audio999

04-15-03   As many may already know there's a nice web page out there e ...   Agonanon

04-21-03   Sooo coool, domo.   Asa


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password