AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Analog > 1008966138  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Which record brush?
Anybody got any strong preferences between the Audioquest and Hunt EDA brushes? Does either one do a better job picking up (vs. moving around) dust? And would either be easier for my wife to use?
Bomarc  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)

12-21-01
  Responses (1-13 of 13)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

12-21-01   ...worth every penny.   Gthrush1

12-21-01   Definitely the hunt - works great   Bob_bundus

12-21-01   Hear, hear (on the hunt)! but only between washings on a vp ...   Cornfedboy

12-21-01   Unless you want to pony up for a alsop and the (constant) re ...   Chazzbo

12-22-01: Su2618
None. Only a machine (Nitty Gritty, VPI etc)will actually clean records. All a brush does it move the light dust from one place to another. The dirt that matters is trapped in the grooves and can only be removed with some kind of vacuum system.
Su2618  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)


12-22-01   Go with the audioquest. it is superior in every way. i hav ...   Fzxguy

01-10-02   Anyone ever use the decca?   Trebleclef

01-24-02   Not to change subject but like this home brew (tech at vpi t ...   Chazzbo

01-24-02   Czaz this all makes good sense esp. the photoflow, which sur ...   Bob_bundus

01-24-02   I agree with fzxguy, the design of the hunt strikes me as si ...   Drubin

01-25-02   Drubin: you coulda saved saved $68.00 and got a ball of sill ...   Gboren

01-25-02   I sort of suspected that at the time, but i'm an easy mark f ...   Drubin

01-25-02   I cryo treated my silly putty and it took out all the bounce ...   Gboren


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password