AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Digital > 1139715855  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Will computer to DAC replace transports and cdp's?
From my limited reading it seems that a cd burned to a hard drive will be a bit for bit copy because of the software programs used to rip music files. A transport has to get it right the first time and feed the info to a dac. Wavelength audio has some interesting articles about computer based systems and have made a strong statement that a transport will never be able to compete with a hard drive>dac combo.

Anybody care to share their thoughts?
Kublakhan  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

02-11-06
  Responses (101-144 of 144)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

03-05-06   i'm no techno geek either, but have a pretty good grasp on ...   Jax2

03-05-06   It looks like a dedicated hard driver with a computer will r ...   Mikesinger

03-05-06   Jax2- hi marco, what an awsome display of generousity! thank ...   Phaelon

03-05-06   Glad to be of help tom. i'm a visual person (by profession ...   Jax2

03-06-06   I totally endorse the squeezebox as a great way to get compu ...   Redkiwi

05-03-06   The best jitter reduction scheme is to clock the transport f ...   Helpdesk

05-04-06   Just fyi - there is a book called 'ipod and itunes' for dumm ...   Kublakhan

05-04-06   There is a point at which reducing jitter further becomes ir ...   Redkiwi

05-04-06   Helpdesk, "the best jitter reduction scheme is to clo ...   Aplhifi

05-04-06   computer to dac is quite a bit different from an ipod, so yo ...   Drubin

05-04-06   Drubin, you can sure run the latest ipod to a dac if you wan ...   Aplhifi

05-04-06   Based on alex's last two posts, it wouldn't surprise me to s ...   Clio09

05-04-06   Just an ipod with a digital output - usb2.0 or firewire, pre ...   Kthomas

05-05-06   Aplhifi, i'm glad to hear that computer audio has a future s ...   Onhwy61

05-04-06   Clio09, well, actually, since i've learned the hard way, i w ...   Aplhifi

05-05-06   Alex, i have a-b'ed the cdsd to emm dac and my pc with a lyn ...   Ecka

05-05-06   I wish you the best of luck alex. i'm a humanitarian at hear ...   Clio09

05-05-06   very classy.   Evita

05-05-06   Ecka, this is interesting. the cdsd is feeding dsd to the da ...   Aplhifi

05-07-06   Aplhifi, your beliefs don't gel with my experience. sure, c ...   Redkiwi

05-08-06   Before this thread goes to the dogs. i would like to thank ...   Artizen65

05-09-06   Alex p. wrote: "the answer is no, if superior audio qua ...   Audioengr

05-09-06   Steve, again, even a 15 years old cd player has a built in ...   Aplhifi

05-09-06   Alex - i agree that if the entire track is read into ram and ...   Audioengr

05-10-06   Steve nugent, which computers have a i2s or i2se interface?   Mburnstein

05-10-06   My recent experiments with the computer and a usb dac have p ...   Splaskin

05-10-06   Mburnstein - you dont want the computer to have the i2s inte ...   Audioengr

05-10-06   I use a waveterminal u24 to take the usb signal from my comp ...   Pardales

05-11-06   Pardales - no this is not a good thing. the power is coming ...   Audioengr

05-11-06   Thanks, audioengr. the u24 has no other power supply options ...   Pardales

05-11-06   Steve, can you make a i2se unit with the sonic frontiers met ...   Mburnstein

05-11-06   Anyone mod their u24 to be powered by batteries instead? i' ...   mikechai@

05-11-06: Audioengr
"Thanks, Audioengr. The U24 has no other power supply options."

If you open it up and cut the trace with +5V on it and inject your own 5V, then this will do the trick.

"It would seem to me that the future lies in USB DAC's, so that extra step of conversion can be skipped altogether. What do you think?"

Absolutely, although separates like USB to I2S and then I2S DAC input work just as well. USB DAC's, at least the good ones, use this technique. Skips the S/PDIF conversion and clock recovery. The USB DAC that I am designing is simply a USB to I2S converter and a DAC board in the same case. The DAC chips all need I2S or some variant anyway. You cannot skip that part. The best sound that I can offer is using I2S interfaces. 4 DAC's currently support it.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
Manufacturer/Modder

Audioengr  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)


05-11-06   "steve, can you make a i2se interface with the sonic fr ...   Audioengr

05-12-06   Steve, does your device also provide the master clock for th ...   Aplhifi

05-12-06   Alex - you bet. i can configure it for 128fs or 256fs. ste ...   Audioengr

05-12-06   Steve the aseemblage 3.1 platinum dac uses the burr brown 1 ...   Mburnstein

05-12-06   Steve, i see, this explains it. however, please be aware tha ...   Aplhifi

05-13-06   The burr brown 1704-k chip uses left-justified data which ca ...   Audioengr

05-13-06   "there are problems transmitting separated data and clo ...   Audioengr

10-19-07   Alex and steve are both geniuses at what they do, i love rea ...   Rx8man

10-20-07   I can't read all the responses but the fact that there have ...   Kublakhan

10-30-07   "steve, i see, this explains it. however, please be awa ...   Artizen65

02-11-10   Hi can everybody tell me about the best software to play mu ...   Mehrdad


< Prev 1 | 2 | 3

  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password