Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
11-29-02
I can agree with that and have myself stated that i wish the ... Brianmgrarcom
11-29-02
Whatjd your points may well be valid but you are looking at ... Ben_campbell
11-29-02
Brianmgrarcom, went to your system page...what a great looki ... Whatjd
11-29-02
Ben, i agree with your thoughts. however, it could be this v ... Whatjd
11-29-02
Whatjd-maybe but i'm still not so sure-i think the problem l ... Ben_campbell
11-29-02
Hi ben, you might try the diana krall "when i look in ... Whatjd
11-29-02
Thanks for the kind words jim. (btw, i just added two new p ... Brianmgrarcom
11-29-02
Is there any evidence that sacd players pick up bits from th ... Calanctus
11-29-02
The player will not pick up bits from the cd layer when play ... Ghostrider45
11-30-02
I'm excited about aerosmiths "big ones" cd. super ... Cdc
11-30-02
Ghostrider45, thanks for your answer. here's hoping you are ... Calanctus
11-30-02: Zaikesman Having seen no evidence at all that dual-layer technology can hurt SACD fidelity, I have to say that I couldn't disagree more with your premise. Sure, one-format machines might be fine, and even desirable, for high end companies to manufacture for audiophiles, but what will cause the format to fail more surely than anything else imaginable, is if the mass-market software is not backward-compatible with consumers' existing CD-playing hardware. If what you secretly wanted to do was kill the emerging format tomorrow (and there might be legit reasons for wanting that, but that's another topic), there would no more certain way to accomplish this than to tell consumers that they must pony up for new machines first, and that neither their new or their old machines would be able to play the other kind of disk, so that they would either need two libraries as well as two machines, or that they would need to purchase their entire libraries over again, something not even possible as things stand today, multi-channel or no. Forget it, unless you restrict you wishes to audiophile labels only, but even then, where's your evidence? Zaikesman (Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)
11-30-02
Whatjd-unfortunately diana krall isn't really my cup of tea. ... Ben_campbell
11-30-02
Ben, i agree that ms. krall is not for everyone...inc. me. ... Whatjd
11-30-02
I have both diana krall sacd discs and both sound superior t ... Czbbcl
11-30-02
Czbbcl, imo, you are a bit deceived in believing the scd-1 c ... Brianmgrarcom
11-30-02
Sacd is already failing commerically...which is why they are ... Phasecorrect
11-30-02
Brianmgrarcom i have heard them all. chuck Czbbcl
11-30-02
Brianmgrarcom i have heard all the players that i mentioned ... Czbbcl
11-30-02
To each their own chuck, i have had the scd-1, 508.24 and em ... Brianmgrarcom
11-30-02
I agree it is a matter of personnel taste at this level of p ... Czbbcl
12-01-02
On the front end, i have a wadia 7/9 combo for red book, and ... Ghostrider45
12-02-02
When testing between a sacd and cd of the same title, you re ... Whatjd
12-02-02
It would be hard for me to get excited again, since i never ... 914nut
12-02-02
Wait a min....anyone that's nuts about the 914 should be fin ... Whatjd
12-03-02
As a matter of fact, whatjd, i have a '73 914 with a 911 3.0 ... 914nut
12-03-02
I already am very excited about sacd, which becomes more eco ... Madisonears
12-03-02
Actually madisonears, all of the above is based on sonic qua ... Whatjd
12-03-02
Just heard sacd for the first time through a $1,000 player o ... Socrates
12-04-02
The more i listen to my own system, with different sacd play ... Pardales
12-04-02
The irony of all of this is that the best digital audio is f ... Phasecorrect
12-05-02
I'm excited about direct-broadcast music. comparing a burned ... Cdc
|
|