AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Speakers > 1223044851  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?
Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
Rebbi  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

10-03-08
  Responses (1101-1150 of 1871)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

04-21-10   Kristian85 hit the mark, imo. perceptive and succinct.   Tvad

04-21-10   "kristian85 hit the mark, imo. perceptive and succinct. ...   Mapman

04-21-10   bullseye.   Tvad

04-21-10   Yes, i would agree also that many often mistake different ...   Mapman

04-21-10   Kristian may be a trained listener, but i'm a trained measur ...   Martykl

04-21-10   Kristian85, your nose is so far in the air you can't see in ...   Thehungryeye

04-21-10   My system and the ohms in conjunction are pretty flat based ...   Mapman

04-22-10   Horses for courses. a few months ago, i listened to $20k/pa ...   Bondmanp

04-22-10   The unique design of the ohms (walsh drivers) are what attra ...   Mapman

04-22-10   Does anyone owning ohm walsh speakers listen primarily to cl ...   Rpfef

04-22-10   Rplef, that's a very good question. audiogoner mamboni is ...   Mapman

04-22-10   Btw, i supect a full/wider range walsh driver like those fou ...   Mapman

04-22-10   I'm buoyed by the reports of fairly flat in-room fr of recen ...   Kristian85

04-22-10   I remember one time using an audio control c-101 equalizer t ...   Tvad

04-22-10   One way o another, speakers (including ohms) must be mated w ...   Mapman

04-22-10   I'd tend to agree that active designs address some real issu ...   Martykl

04-22-10   Mapman, i understand your comment, however my point was (i t ...   Tvad

04-22-10   Kristian makes some good points - but the pro worlds and civ ...   Zkzpb8

04-22-10: Almarg
I remember one time using an Audio Control C-101 equalizer to EQ my system's room response so it measured flat. The Audio Control unit came with a microphone and automatic EQ software to enable this to be done.

The funny thing is the results absolutely sucked, and the Audio Control manual (which is perhaps the best manual I've ever read...helpful and humorous at the same time) said they'd probably suck.

I'd be very surprised if most listeners would really prefer flat room response given the opportunity to A/B the options.
Grant, I believe that a major reason for that is that the mic + equalizer/analyzer, unless it is very sophisticated, doesn't discriminate between direct (early arriving) sound, and reflected (later arriving) sound, while our ears do.

Which would seem to say that unless the room is an anechoic chamber, a setup that produces measured flat frequency response at the listening position is wrong "a priori."

Best regards,
-- Al

Almarg  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)


04-22-10   good hearing does not have a flat response. http://www.en ...   Line

04-22-10   by *set up* are you referring specifically to the eq i used, ...   Tvad

04-22-10   any system, unless the measurement equipment is extremely so ...   Almarg

04-22-10   Its true our ears are sensitive detectors of sound. try the ...   Mapman

04-22-10   Al, what you describe seems to me to be an argument against ...   Tvad

04-22-10   i much prefer the ear-cupped sound. someone should make an e ...   Tvad

04-22-10   Re flat frequency response at the listening position. every ...   Newbee

04-22-10   yes, exactly, although i wouldn't say "avoids." i ...   Almarg

04-22-10   This is a very hot debate and i'm not sure i have much to co ...   Hifidon

04-23-10   Interesting mwts (which i have not heard) were more forward. ...   Mapman

04-23-10   Tvad, do you happen to remember i think stereophile or one o ...   Frazeur1

04-23-10   Rpfef: fwiw, i listen to some classical, but not a majority ...   Bondmanp

04-23-10   Almarg is correct; shoving a highly resolving system's signa ...   Kristian85

04-23-10   Martykl, there is never anything to be traded away by using ...   Kristian85

04-23-10   "what i cannot abide are speakers with messy fr and dis ...   Mapman

04-23-10   Kristian85, putting aside the issue of the audio control c-1 ...   Tvad

04-23-10   Tvad, it's difficult, and requires more sophisticated measur ...   Kristian85

04-23-10   Kristian, of course there is a trade-away, although it may ...   Martykl

04-23-10   what i'm having trouble understanding is this statement take ...   Tvad

04-24-10   Tvad said, "i'd be very surprised if most listeners wou ...   Acoustat6

04-24-10   Tvad said, "how do you measure your room to determine i ...   Acoustat6

04-24-10   Bob, if you do not want flat, what do you want? output gen ...   Martykl

04-24-10   the option at the time i owned the audio control c-101 (with ...   Tvad

04-24-10   bob, i appreciate your desire to be helpful, however this qu ...   Tvad

04-24-10   I'm at a loss on what is really meant by a flat room. for in ...   Line

04-24-10   Line -- that was a good reference you provided earlier. how ...   Almarg

04-24-10   Al--i see. what i thing comes much closer to reaching that g ...   Line

04-24-10   Yes, i did the measurement thing years ago out of curiosity, ...   Mapman

04-24-10   Line -- yes, i have two or three binaural recordings from th ...   Almarg

04-24-10   Just to set the record straight, in an earlier post i mentio ...   Tvad

05-07-10   Mapman, i agree! ohm was way ahead of their time. i have bee ...   Armyscout41


< Prev << 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 >> Next >

  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password