AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Speakers > 1205621717  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Difference between today and yesterday.
What are the diferences in sound between speakers made today and those of yesteryear?
Are there some from the past that will still sound better than most speakers made today
Given that most of the electronics and especially turntable tonearms and cartridges have imporved so much that this may be the first time ever some of the old models have an opportunity to sound their best, no?
Pedrillo  (System | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

03-15-08
  Responses (1-67 of 67)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

03-15-08   I would say - oh no - paper vs plastic. most old speakers we ...   Joeylawn36111

03-15-08   some say that speakers peaked in the late 60's to mid 70's ...   Hifisoundguy

03-15-08   It depends on the music. for "big" music, symphoni ...   Eldartford

03-15-08   A lot has been gained in the last 20 years in the area of ma ...   Rodman99999

03-15-08   Thank you all. rodman i think you make some very good points ...   Pedrillo

03-16-08   There are quite a few old speakers that have stood the test ...   Ngjockey

03-16-08   It is a matter of preference: personally, i prefer the apog ...   Mrtennis

03-16-08   Mrtennis, we seem to share this preference for planar speake ...   Detlof

03-16-08   if we stick to sound quality... i'd agree with the above, ...   Shadorne

03-16-08   I have wondered with great interest the reviews that the old ...   French_fries

03-16-08   This always strikes me as a weird argument - that somehow ol ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-16-08   Total disagree with the past having as hi a performance as m ...   Johnk

03-16-08   i would take my 1974 sansui sp-5500's over anything made to ...   Hifisoundguy

03-16-08   And modern violins are much better than those old stradivari ...   Eldartford

03-16-08   Lol: well spoken eldartford! especially those ss powered one ...   Detlof

03-16-08   I had those same sansui speakers and they are what got me in ...   Rbirke

03-16-08   Eldarford- how many current violin manufactures spend two to ...   Rodman99999

03-16-08   One of the big differences between today and yesterday is th ...   Eee3

03-16-08   Well rodman, i do and that is why i stuck with my quad 57 an ...   Detlof

03-16-08   Eldartford confuses technique with technological advancement ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-16-08   Douglas_schroeder...how so?   Eldartford

03-16-08   Detlof- was that the ionofane plasma tweeter? the technolo ...   Rodman99999

03-16-08   Eldartford, the error in your logic is that you compare a mu ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-16-08   Hi doug: this hobby is based upon subjective perception and ...   Mrtennis

03-16-08   Rodman99999...you enjoy your old harley, although a new hond ...   Eldartford

03-16-08   Douglas_schroeder...old volin vs new violin, apple to apple. ...   Eldartford

03-16-08   I absolutely agree with your comments concerning aircraft. ...   Rodman99999

03-17-08   Your ears have changed as much as the speaker has..?   Nuguy

03-17-08   Like i said most who say vintage is the best performing are ...   Johnk

03-17-08   Rodman99999...needle, ball, and airspeed, and the door open. ...   Eldartford

03-17-08   There is some serious nostalgitis happening here. mrtennis ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-17-08   There's a paradox going on here. undoubtedly modern product ...   Onhwy61

03-17-08   Hi doug: my preference is based upon hours and hours of lis ...   Mrtennis

03-17-08   Gentlemen: the proof of the pudding is what someone does wi ...   Mrtennis

03-17-08   Eldartford(et al): i'd love to own a plane like that(it woul ...   Rodman99999

03-17-08   Well rodman, i did exactly as you suggest, i don't know how ...   Detlof

03-17-08   Mrtennis, bold proposition my friend! :) it's obvious you're ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-17-08   Detlof- like i said: owning those quads speaks of your love ...   Rodman99999

03-17-08   I would dispute that there has been much technological advan ...   Ngjockey

03-18-08   To the casual observer there are not many differences in bic ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-18-08   Not all loudspeaker manufacters offer just tragic cones and ...   Johnk

03-18-08   Douglas schroeder, would like to hear what other speakers yo ...   Pedrillo

03-18-08   Pedrillo, the principle holds true generally for any speaker ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-19-08   Hi doug: my vintage system would include stacked quad 57s. ...   Mrtennis

03-19-08   Douglas_schroeder question? why aren't two smaller woofers ...   Pedrillo

03-19-08   Pedrillo, mathematically they may add up to the same pistoni ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-19-08   I have been in the live music space for 30 years. i have wo ...   Bongofury

03-19-08   Mrt, what can i say? that is an exceptional vintage speaker! ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-20-08   If you listen to companies like wilson even last years model ...   Chadnliz

03-20-08   Quad 57s could be driven by a 35 watt maple tree el 34 amp, ...   Mrtennis

03-20-08   One of the areas where speakers have not, for the most part, ...   Gbmcleod

03-21-08   In order to compare live music with a recording, it is neces ...   Mrtennis

03-21-08: Rodman99999
Mrtennis- If a person attends live performances on a regular basis, it's natural to become accustomed to certain things that ARE consistant. IE: the sound stage of live venues, the SPL of live music, impact of a kick-drum, how the size and timbre of a piano(or any instrument) are perceived, How the wood of a double bass(and rosin on the bow) can be felt, the breath over the reed of a sax, the "hole in the middle" of a concert orchestra, the human singing voice especially, breaths taken, and how one can actually hear the resonance of the chest cavity in person(I could go on). As I suggested: If one were to listen to a particular music group live, then take a recording(hopefully a well engineered one) of that group's music home to play on their system: they would have a better idea if the system was accurate. That wouldn't take much aural memory at all. And yet: It's not hard to retain the sound of "live" IF you know how to listen to/focus on individual sounds/instruments. All it takes is a DESIRE to train one's ears and brain to do so. But- most are satisfied with their preferences as their references, and that's fine too. I have the benefit of access to musicians, instruments, live music and original recordings all the time. It's cost me dearly over the years to try and re-create the gestalt of live music in my home, but my system is only the vehicle to deliver what I love, and not what I love.
Rodman99999  (Threads | Answers | This Thread)


03-21-08   Mrtennis-we did exactly what you propose many years ago: we ...   Detlof

03-21-08   There are some other variables which make things even more d ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-21-08   Was it duke ellington who said "if it sounds good, it i ...   Eldartford

03-21-08   Detlof- i've been bi-amping with planars for years(tubes/to ...   Rodman99999

03-21-08   Douglas- i agree with the greatest part of what you said. ...   Rodman99999

03-23-08   I do want to remember that the original post was: are speake ...   Gbmcleod

03-23-08   This thread is a mobius strip; flips back around and goes no ...   Douglas_schroeder

03-24-08   Is it possible that musicians might disagree ? if so, the a ...   Mrtennis

03-24-08   Mrt, forgive me, but we know that and you've repeatedly told ...   Detlof

03-24-08   There have been many demonstrations of speaker fidelity put ...   Eldartford

03-24-08   Lets look at the main trend in audio reproduction: increasi ...   Mrtennis

03-29-08   I believe musicians might disagree on an orchestral recordin ...   Gbmcleod

03-29-08   Gbmcleod, i agree with what you said and would like to add s ...   Pedrillo

03-29-08   I think speakers that are older were built better.case in po ...   Racerx322


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password