Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
12-31-02: 1musiclover I have not heard the MKIII, but I own the MKIIs and can honestly say that I'm ecSTATIC (no pun intended) with them. I compared the MKIIs with the ML Quests, and Requests and the Eros is a much better speaker overall, especially in the bass area. The bass is much tighter, lower, faster and better defined, thanks in part to the transmission line desigen, and crossover amp. The crossover/amp allows you to place the speakers almost against the wall without the resulting thumpy bass, something you can't do with MLs.
Imaging is excellent, soundstage is accurate, and of course, the stat panels bring the music to life -- everytime you listen. You may find the MKIIs on the 'gon for sale, and save yourself a bundle.
To top things off, you can't get better product support than Roger Sanders.
Good luck. 1musiclover (Threads | Answers | This Thread)
12-31-02
I am sure everything 1musiclover says is accurate about mkii ... Sunnyjim
01-01-03
I own the eros mk-ii also and according to roger sanders, so ... Plato
01-01-03: 1musiclover Sunnyjim
You are right -- the sweetspot is narrow when compared to dynamic speakers. However, what you do hear when you are in the sweetspot is considerably better than what you would hear from the others. I considered it like this -- How often am really listening to music when I am not sitting in the sweetspot anyway? When I am up moving around with "background" music playing, I am not listening critically so it doesn't matter that the sweetspot is narrower than MLs or Quads. 1musiclover (Threads | Answers | This Thread)
01-01-03
the designer of the inner-tube/innersound tube amp has be ... Tpsonic
01-01-03
the designer of the inner-tube/innersound tube amp has be ... Tpsonic
01-03-03
Well, i have had a pair of the mk1's since they first came o ... Scotty_910
|
|