AudiogoN
Search Buy Sell Learn MyPage
 Learn > Forums > Home Theater > 1141986419  Start New Thread | Log In | Bookmark This
  Upcoming plasma 1080p tv's vs Sony SXRD LoCS?
Hi everyone,
I recently read that the plasma tv manufacturers will be introducing new 1080p models latter this year, or early next year.
I am especially interested in the upcoming Pioneer and Panasonic 1080p plasma displays.
I love the slim profile and sexiness of a flat panel display such as a plasma, but I still feel that the Sony SXRD LoCS rear projection tv's still surpass them in overall video quality and video detail resolution.
I was extremely interested in the future SED tv's, but read with great disappointment that they will be delayed until 2008! I am beginning to wonder if they will EVER be available?
What do you all feel the video quality will be like on the new 1080p plasma displays?
Do you all feel thats there is any chance that the 1080p plasmas could equal or surpass the Sony SXRD rptv's in overall video quality?
Any comments on this and/or the SED tv delay would be greatly appreciated.
Daltonlanny  (System | Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)

03-10-06
  Responses (1-31 of 31)
Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.

03-10-06   What was your source for seds not ready for prime time til 2 ...   Porziob

03-10-06   Well i have seen all of the upcoming 1080p plasmas and the s ...   Rysa4

03-10-06   I checked out sony's latest dlp and many plasma models, incl ...   Dawgbyte

03-10-06   I'm hoping that sony includes 1080p input on next years' sxr ...   Northwoods_maine

03-10-06   Read about the delay on canon/toshiba's sed tv's on www.avsf ...   Daltonlanny

03-10-06   The plasma bubble will burst. after having the display die 6 ...   Mapleleafs3

03-10-06   Hi guys, not trying to stir up anything, but i have to agree ...   Audio_girl

03-10-06   For those that like the sony sxrd, try to find the hp md6580 ...   Reubent

03-10-06   Anyone noticed the pink tint on the sony sxrd besides me?   Gobulls32

03-11-06   The sony sxrd locs rptv's: 1. won sound and visions product ...   Audio_girl

03-11-06   I did. its cool we all have different opinions. no big deal. ...   Rysa4

03-11-06   Rsya4, i whole-heartedly disagree with you about the only th ...   Daltonlanny

03-11-06   I've heard many people say that hd on a crt is the best, but ...   Drubin

03-11-06   Thanks for your reply dalton. you are welcome to disagree. b ...   Rysa4

03-12-06   I have to agree with rysa4. as an owner of plasma (nec) and ...   Semi

03-12-06   No, its not just black levels. again, the contrast ratio is ...   Daltonlanny

03-12-06   Guys, i still have to say that imho, and to my eyes, my sony ...   Audio_girl

03-12-06   Hey guys, check out randy tomlinson's review of the sony kds ...   Audio_girl

03-13-06: Rysa4
Certainly an interesting discussion. Plasma, LCD, and CRT are direct view technologies, while LCosS ( Sony SXRD and JVC D-ILA), DLP and LCD-P are projection technologies. I prefer direct view for PQ at this point becuase it gives more realism to me.

1. CRT- This technology is quickly becoming unavailable as in the past. I dont doubt it strengths. Weaknesses are peak brightness and a propensity to a long list of artifacts including Moire, Gaussian Beam, Drift, screen regulation and magnetic interferrence. But again, for better or for worse, its not a real consideration for the OP question becuase it is disappearing rapidly from stores.

2. Plasma - Its pretty interesting as some folks have a real hard time with objectively looking at the thing. For instance " Spatial and Temporal dithering." Well OK. Lets look at a Pioneer Elite Pro 1130 plasma display ( currently available). It doesnt have that stuff. No way. And certainly no motion artifacts. Major brand plasmas do not have motion artifacts. The more realism issue is not an illusion that passes. It stays and the images dont fatigue most viewers like displays that depend on bright light to show video information. IN the dark, plasmas tend to really outdistance other technologies, but not in lighter environments.

3. LCos- First a couple of things. Randy Tomlinson is just another poster at avsforum.com in the plasma section like the rest of us. When you run with the writers and manufacturers and dealers in your HT and audio groups and national meetings and such, they are people with interest and knowledge just like us. Except some of the periodicals have various advertiser pressures that can affect their comments in one way or another. This has been discussed thoroughly and then some in the whole Wilson audio reviewer threads. That aside, the Hitachi 55 inch, which I looked at side by side with their 42 inch ALIS panel in direct comparison same source at CES in January, is a good plasma but isnt as strong in PQ as their 42 inch one. Also, I just wanted to point out that some specific comments really indicate a concerning bias. Plasma in the residential setting has almost zero potential for burn in. I mean none. Unless you really really try. I have NEVER seen it in the residential setting, and certainly havent had it myself. If it is so great a problem? Why can I only see it on old monitors in train stations and airports? Any reviewer that lists this as an advantage for an alternative products is really reaching and should know better. Plasma burn in- a real myth. Up close it exhibited SDE- well yes sure. But how close do people watch their movies? AT 10 feet people with 20/20 vision do not see SDE. ON the 1080P plasmas, you dont get any even on the big ones until 3-4 feet. 3-4 feet. On a 103 inch plasma. Believe it. Now- descfribing the you are there effect as "an illusion" is silly. I guess that is a shared and very persistent illusion. Let me put it this way- My dog gets tricked by the plasma and gets involved with the dog scenes on my plasma if there is one in a movie. Kinda funny. IN front of my LCDs and CRTs, he just sits there. He knows the difference between watching a TV and something more realistic!!! HAHA. But its true. The flesh tone thing blows the deal on the Tomlinson review entirely. A plasma really shows extremely realistic skin tones and details. When watching the Sony SXRD, which again is RAZOR SHARP for sure, and sharper than my plasma also FOR SURE. the skin tones are simply less realistic. I am watching a very sharp brilliant TV, and I know it. The plasma, when calibrated, is simply closer to real world. And SED, I am going to say again, is just scary good.

I do think the Sony SXRD Line sets a new standard for rear projection technology. And I recommend it to many friends for various reasons Its a really good display. Really good. But to say that its head and shoulders above plasma technology really is a bit foolhardy!

Rysa4  (Answers | This Thread)


03-13-06   I work in the financial ind....sed: due to plummeting lcd, p ...   Henryhk

03-13-06   Henry- you are exactly right. the price drop really makes it ...   Rysa4

03-13-06   Sorry that i started such a disagreement by starting this th ...   Daltonlanny

03-13-06   Rysa, again, my eyes tell me that sxrd is head and shoulders ...   Audio_girl

03-13-06   Hey lanny, what are you apologizing for? this discussion is ...   Drubin

03-13-06   I own an sxrd set (the qualia 70" rptv), so obviously, ...   Larryi

03-13-06   Op- no need to apologize. actually i believe the discussion ...   Rysa4

03-13-06   Larryi, what you are referring to is called sse (silk screen ...   Semi

03-16-06   I don't think comparing tv's at a retailer is fair. the fact ...   Stereo

03-17-06   Hello all, my impressions have changed somewhat. i admit, i ...   Daltonlanny

03-16-06   All, i've investigate to no avail: sony's sxrd rptvs etc are ...   Henryhk

03-17-06   Have had the sony for a few weeks. its so awesome. best i ha ...   Mapleleafs3


  Post your response
Subject


Your response

No html, but you may use markup tags


Username
Members only

Password