Click title to read one, or click date to read all below it.
01-25-09: Dawgcatching
Yeah, I can recommend it whole-heartedly. A great pre! Smooth, easy on the ears, dead quiet, responds well to tube rolling. It isn't overly lush, but quite detailed with a somewhat warm presentation, depending on what tube you are running, and your other components. I had some significantly more expensive preamps in my system that I was auditioning (current retail up to $7000, sell for $3-4k used) and none of them were outclassed by the Dehavilland. Slightly more detailed, deeper soundstage yes, but the differences weren't what you would expect, considering the big price difference.
It will be hard to find a bad word about the Ultraverve. Given what they go for, I doubt you can do better.
Dawgcatching (Reviews | Threads | Answers | This Thread)
01-25-09
Thank you dawgcatching. i really appreciate your comments. ... Mastro
01-25-09
No, i haven't heard any of those. what i did have in my syst ... Dawgcatching
01-25-09
Hi mastro: i used to have an ultraverve & thought it was eve ... Classical1
01-26-09
I auditioned the ultra verve , in preparation for a review. ... Mrtennis
01-26-09
Mr. tennis, why would you possibly return the preamp because ... Fiddler
01-26-09
01-26-09: fiddler mr. tennis, why would you possibly return ... Audiofeil
01-26-09
Thank you dawgcatching and classical1 for your thoughts. it ... Mastro
01-26-09
I don't review products whose reviews would be very critical ... Mrtennis
01-26-09
Mr t said: this surprises me as the ultraverve was the 1st ... Classical1
01-26-09
That's his opinion. do a search on his other posts. you'll ... Audiofeil
01-26-09
I owned the uv for several months. it is a great preamp for ... Audiogabby
01-27-09
I had the uv for well over a year and just recently sold it ... Shakeydeal
|
|
